Graphing and linearisation of data
Plotting experimental data as a straight line rather than a curve makes deviations, systematic errors, and the fit parameters themselves far easier to read by eye, so a nonlinear relationship is routinely linearised — by re-plotting a transformed combination of the variables, such as log(y) against x or y against x squared — chosen so the underlying physical law predicts a straight line.
Practise this conceptRaw experimental data plotted exactly as a physical law predicts often comes out as a curve rather than a straight line — inverse-square laws, quadratic relationships, and exponential decays are all common in physics and none of them produce straight lines when plotted directly. Curves are harder to work with than straight lines for a very practical reason: the human eye is excellent at judging whether points lie on a straight line and at spotting outliers or systematic curvature in the scatter, but far worse at judging these things against a curved reference. Fitting parameters are also easier to extract from a line — a slope and an intercept — than from the several parameters that typically define a curve.
Linearisation exploits this by re-plotting a transformed combination of the measured variables, chosen specifically so that the underlying physical law predicts a straight line in the new coordinates. If theory predicts y = kx², plotting y against x² (rather than against x) produces a straight line through the origin with slope k — the transformation does not change the underlying physics at all, it only changes which combination of variables is placed on each axis. If theory predicts exponential decay, y = A·e^(−λx), plotting the natural logarithm of y against x produces a straight line with slope −λ and intercept ln(A), since taking the logarithm of both sides gives ln(y) = ln(A) − λx, an equation linear in x. Power-law relationships y = Ax^n are similarly linearised by plotting log(y) against log(x), which gives a line of slope n and intercept log(A).
The choice of which transformation to apply is not arbitrary; it must follow directly from the specific functional form the underlying physics predicts. Applying an unjustified transformation can force almost any data into looking roughly linear, which defeats the entire purpose — linearisation is a tool for testing and extracting parameters from a specific predicted relationship, not for making arbitrary data look tidy. Once genuinely linearised, a straight-line fit (see least-squares fitting) gives both the best-fit values of the physical parameters and a clear visual and statistical check of whether the data actually supports the assumed relationship in the first place.
Key ideas
Requires: Uncertainty and error
Common misconceptions
- Linearising data changes the underlying physical relationship between the measured quantities.
- A curved graph of raw data is just as easy to interpret and check for errors as a straight-line graph of the same data.
- Any transformation at all can be applied to linearise any dataset, regardless of the actual physical relationship involved.
Resources
Part of these UT courses
This concept is mapped as covering part of the following course(s) in the University of Tartu curriculum.
- Laboratory practical (physics)LTFY.01.011