Radiometric and photometric quantities
Radiometric quantities (radiant flux, in watts) measure light as pure physical energy, unweighted; photometric quantities (luminous flux, in lumens) weight that same light by how sensitive the human eye is at each wavelength. Two sources with equal radiant flux can have wildly different luminous flux if one emits mostly green light, where the eye is most sensitive, and the other mostly deep red or infrared, where it barely responds at all.
Practise this conceptPhysics has a perfectly good, colour-blind way to measure light: count the energy arriving per second, in watts, exactly as you would for any other form of electromagnetic radiation. That's the radiometric approach, and it's what a power meter or a solar cell responds to — it doesn't care whether the light is red, green, ultraviolet, or infrared, only how much energy is in it.
Human vision doesn't work that way. The eye's sensitivity to light varies enormously with wavelength: it's most sensitive to green light around 555 nanometres, falls off toward both red and blue, and drops to essentially nothing past the edges of the visible spectrum — infrared and ultraviolet carry real radiant power but produce no sensation of brightness at all. Photometric quantities exist specifically to capture what a source looks like to a human observer rather than what a power meter reads. The photometric counterpart to radiant flux (watts) is luminous flux, measured in lumens, and it's built by weighting each wavelength's power by the eye's sensitivity curve before adding it up.
Because that weighting varies so much across the spectrum, there is no single fixed conversion factor between watts and lumens — it depends entirely on the light's colour. The one number worth remembering is the theoretical ceiling: at the eye's peak sensitivity wavelength, one watt of radiant power converts to 683 lumens, which is in fact how the lumen itself is defined. Any other colour converts less efficiently than that, and a source radiating substantial power entirely outside the visible range — a heat lamp, an infrared remote control — can have a large radiant flux and essentially zero luminous flux, because none of that power falls anywhere the eye can register it.
Key ideas
Requires: Electromagnetic waves
Formulas
| Symbol | Name | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| radiant flux | W (watt) | |
| luminous flux | lm (lumen) |
Common misconceptions
- Treating watts and lumens as two names for the same physical quantity, convertible with a single fixed factor regardless of colour — rather than lumens depending on how strongly the human eye responds to that specific wavelength.
- Believing an infrared heat lamp with high radiant flux must also produce a lot of luminous flux, since it is radiating a lot of power — the eye barely responds to infrared at all, so almost none of that power counts as light.
- Believing luminous efficacy peaks at 683 lumens per watt for every colour of light, rather than that number being the theoretical maximum, reached only at the single wavelength (about 555 nm, green) where the eye is most sensitive — every other colour converts less efficiently.
Resources
Part of these UT courses
This concept is mapped as covering part of the following course(s) in the University of Tartu curriculum.
- OpticsLOFY.01.008